10/7/2023 0 Comments Ms teams m1 chip![]() If not, you are going to have to use a pirated license to get it on a mac. If they do then you will be able to buy it and install it on a Mac legally. So the correct question shouldn’t be will MS support windows on a Mac (they wont), it should be "are they going to sell individual licenses of Windows on Arm to the public?". The issue is they don’t sell individual Windows on Arm licenses right now, they only sell licenses to OEMs. Microsoft will never go out of its way for a specific circumstance such as running Windows on a Mac. They sell you a Windows license and if it works on your machines, such as a Mac or VM great, if not that’s not really their problem. Microsoft has NEVER supported windows on mac, whether on boot camp or in a virtual machine. ![]() It will also bring them a regular income, compared to a one-off license. Does their software even run under WoA? Probably a lot of it is legacy stuff anyway that will struggle with Windows 10 on Intel, let alone trying to run under emulation on a virtualised platform.MS has better options (for MS) Windows 365, for example, VMs in the cloud running native Windows on supported hardware. The last thing Microsoft wants to do is start compromising this version with support for Mac hardware.That leaves the Mac users who need Windows for one specific (non-Microsoft) application, for example, in a dilemma, they can’t move to M1 and keep Windows VMs running. It has done away with a lot of legacy cruft already and is aimed at a specific SoC. This is the "cleanest" version of Windows there is out there. Everything else these days is cloud based.There is less and less need for Microsoft to have Windows running in virtual machines or in Bootcamp on Macs. They have the Office suite (with the exception of Access), always have had, the Office suite started life on the Mac and was ported to Windows, replacing Multiplan and Word for DOS. On the other hand, they are where the customers are. But I’m also tired of Apple getting a pass for behavior that others companies get criticized for. I need to put myself in the position of those impacted by this. I completely get this is a change for them in terms of what users can typically do with Windows.As I originally said – this bothers me less than it probably should. So – comparing the behavior of both companies here: why would this behavior be acceptable from Apple and not from Microsoft. Their solution has always been ‘buy a Mac if you want MacOS’. I’m just saying that, from a personal standpoint, Apple engages in the same behavior with respect to the virtualization of their OS. From the stand point of people like wright_is – this is clearly an issue that can impact people using the MacOS platform but still have need for Windows in specific instances. I’m not saying I agree with this decision from Microsoft. But I am sure Microsoft has the sales figures on the WoA devices to justify whatever decision they want to make on this. Right?"I don’t know that I’d go that far. "But no worries, I’m sure Microsoft will get a ton of sales of WoA from all their wonderful devices that run it. ![]() A business, on the other hand, can’t afford to use unlicensed software or unsupported software for production purposes. But what percentage of the total are they? And they also, probably, don’t mind running an Insider Build, which might be unstable occasionally. We are a Windows user, but we also have Windows instances in our ESXi infrastructure for accessing resources on different sites, or shared applications etc.If you are a business, you can justify the cost of a Windows cloud instance, that gets billed onto the client, either directly or indirectly through hourly rates etc.The ones this really hurts is the home user, who can’t justify a cloud instance of Windows. Either terminal servers, virtual instances on their ESXi, HyperV Servers etc. The noisy minority always bubble up to the surface, but I wonder if there are any statistics about the number of Windows VMs running on Macs?And business users have other options, today. No need to keep rebooting to jump back and forth.It would be interesting to know what percentage of users actually use Windows VMs these days. There hasn’t been much of a need to "go native" for about a decade now.Fusion or Parallels with Unity mode means that you can run the Windows software as if it were a native Mac application.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |